|
Day 4
Mar 25, 2013 11:54:11 GMT -5
Post by saber on Mar 25, 2013 11:54:11 GMT -5
Or whoever they targeted got a guard last night.
|
|
|
Day 4
Mar 25, 2013 11:56:20 GMT -5
Post by invictus on Mar 25, 2013 11:56:20 GMT -5
Or whoever they targeted got a guard last night. Good, yes. Gandalf was a little suspicious of Blah; he and Cesare seem the top targets for death tonight. I guess I think we should wait a little longer and see how the voting develops, particularly who Bedlam latches onto. Who should we shard-cure?
|
|
|
Day 4
Mar 25, 2013 11:59:17 GMT -5
Post by saber on Mar 25, 2013 11:59:17 GMT -5
I also REALLY don't like that Gizzy vote. There's several dead people who should know that I'm mafia by now (such as Obi and INANTP). I'm not sure what that dust-up was over Gizzy's post yesterday breaking the dead communication rules, but I'm not wild about it.
We know she's not a special (since our vote manip curse took on her), but I'm putting it out there.
|
|
|
Day 4
Mar 25, 2013 12:00:16 GMT -5
Post by saber on Mar 25, 2013 12:00:16 GMT -5
I tossed shard cure on Eric Zahn. Relic corruption still seems pretty useful and he's totally under the radar right now.
|
|
|
Day 4
Mar 25, 2013 12:09:33 GMT -5
Post by saber on Mar 25, 2013 12:09:33 GMT -5
One last thing to consider: So far we have killed one special from each of the guilds aside from Asphodel.
The description for asphodel: Underlund politics are ruled by the Asphodel, the aristocratic guild that traces its origins back to the beginning of Underlund. The Asphodel is composed of both the ruling elite and the knights who protect Underlund from invading forces. Members of the Asphodel often believe that it is their divine right to rule, that their decisions are infallible and unquestionable. It is not uncommon for an Asphodel member to view nonmembers as subhuman.
Another possibility is while the specials were evenly distributed, there was one assigned to each guild. Guard seems natural with Asphodel's " the knights who protect Underlund from invading forces"
|
|
|
Day 4
Mar 25, 2013 12:19:03 GMT -5
Post by flarne on Mar 25, 2013 12:19:03 GMT -5
The Gizzy dead thing wasn't anything that implicated us in any way.
|
|
|
Day 4
Mar 25, 2013 12:30:08 GMT -5
Post by saber on Mar 25, 2013 12:30:08 GMT -5
Cool. Less worried then, I'm guessing it's just her continuing to think about who would kill bradicus.
|
|
|
Day 4
Mar 25, 2013 13:07:00 GMT -5
Post by facetious on Mar 25, 2013 13:07:00 GMT -5
Going back to the Bedlam thing just a little, I'm starting to think we might want to kill him sooner than later. If he does/has picked up on the curse, then the smart play would be for him to tell someone that if he's killed by the mafia, that probably means whoever his vote was on that night is mafia. If we kill him before he manages to get a vote on one of us, that not only saves us that particular worry but could potentially throw suspicion on whomever his vote was on.
Not saying necessarily to do it tonight, just that waiting becomes more and more of a gamble as our percentage presence grows higher.
|
|
|
Day 4
Mar 25, 2013 13:58:50 GMT -5
Post by invictus on Mar 25, 2013 13:58:50 GMT -5
Going back to the Bedlam thing just a little, I'm starting to think we might want to kill him sooner than later. If he does/has picked up on the curse, then the smart play would be for him to tell someone that if he's killed by the mafia, that probably means whoever his vote was on that night is mafia. If we kill him before he manages to get a vote on one of us, that not only saves us that particular worry but could potentially throw suspicion on whomever his vote was on. Not saying necessarily to do it tonight, just that waiting becomes more and more of a gamble as our percentage presence grows higher. I think Bedlam would have to be brilliant to infer all of that from what's happened. Only twice has the person he's voted for died, and one time Larlar was also killing that guy, and the other time it was very clear that Gandalf was going to die. I take your point seriously; if he realizes he's a seer/vig, that'd be amazing for him and we'd need to kill him, but the data is not there for him to make that inference yet.
|
|
|
Day 4
Mar 25, 2013 14:24:29 GMT -5
Post by facetious on Mar 25, 2013 14:24:29 GMT -5
I have like 40 minutes to figure out who to vote for and I have no idea. bleh.
|
|
|
Day 4
Mar 25, 2013 14:29:05 GMT -5
Post by kime on Mar 25, 2013 14:29:05 GMT -5
Going back to the Bedlam thing just a little, I'm starting to think we might want to kill him sooner than later. If he does/has picked up on the curse, then the smart play would be for him to tell someone that if he's killed by the mafia, that probably means whoever his vote was on that night is mafia. If we kill him before he manages to get a vote on one of us, that not only saves us that particular worry but could potentially throw suspicion on whomever his vote was on. Not saying necessarily to do it tonight, just that waiting becomes more and more of a gamble as our percentage presence grows higher. I think Bedlam would have to be brilliant to infer all of that from what's happened. Only twice has the person he's voted for died, and one time Larlar was also killing that guy, and the other time it was very clear that Gandalf was going to die. I take your point seriously; if he realizes he's a seer/vig, that'd be amazing for him and we'd need to kill him, but the data is not there for him to make that inference yet. /agree
|
|
|
Day 4
Mar 25, 2013 14:30:29 GMT -5
Post by facetious on Mar 25, 2013 14:30:29 GMT -5
And yeah like I said, re: Bedlam it's more of a 'looking ahead' thing. Just something to be aware of.
|
|
|
Day 4
Mar 25, 2013 14:35:40 GMT -5
Post by trv on Mar 25, 2013 14:35:40 GMT -5
Stirring up some trouble to see what happens.
|
|
|
Day 4
Mar 25, 2013 14:49:36 GMT -5
Post by OSA on Mar 25, 2013 14:49:36 GMT -5
Guys, a guard could still be there. Bucketman has been rping his knight thing pretty heavily. This could just be that he is rping ...or..It could mean that he is trying to get people to see the whole "knight in shining armor" thing.
Just an observation.
|
|
|
Day 4
Mar 25, 2013 14:53:50 GMT -5
Post by trv on Mar 25, 2013 14:53:50 GMT -5
Can we.... can we eat him?
|
|